3.8 Article

Preferences and Insights for Participation in a Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Prevention Trial: A Mixed-Methods Study

Journal

ACR OPEN RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 4, Issue 11, Pages 974-982

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11500

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. William P. Arend Rheumatology Research Endowment
  2. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Scholar award 2017 [16813]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the factors influencing the decisions of individuals with ACPA positivity to participate in a prevention trial for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The results showed that participants were more concerned about personal risk and benefits, while non-participants were more concerned about medication side effects and lack of personal or family experience with RA. Participants also had a higher proportion of first-degree relatives with RA. Further exploration is needed to understand these differences and inform prevention strategies.
Objective In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) can be elevated prior to inflammatory arthritis (IA). The potential to intervene in people with ACPA positivity underpins the development of prevention trials in RA. The Research Participation Influences Study examined factors influencing the decisions of individuals who are ACPA(+) to participate in a prevention trial using qualitative and quantitative methods. Methods Individuals with ACPA positivity without IA were provided information regarding their risk for future RA, were provided a description of a clinical prevention trial using hydroxychloroquine, and were asked if they would participate in the trial. After agreeing to or declining participation, they were surveyed on what influenced their decision using Likert scales and open-response questions. Results Thirty-nine individuals who agreed to trial participation (enrollees) and 31 individuals who declined (nonenrollees) completed surveys. Enrollees expressed greater perceived risk for RA and greater perception of benefit to themselves or others than nonenrollees. Nonenrollees expressed greater concern about medication effects and less personal or family experience with RA than enrollees. There was a higher proportion of first-degree relatives (FDRs) of people with RA in enrollees versus nonenrollees (54% vs. 23%, P = 0.01). Conclusion Enrollees were more likely than nonenrollees to be FDRs, exhibit stronger concern for personal risk for RA, and have less concern about adverse effects. Further exploration is needed to determine why these differences were present, including exploration of symptoms and the role of family history. Understanding these issues will better inform researchers and individuals who are candidates for prevention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available