4.6 Article

Information Bottleneck Measurement for Compressed Sensing Image Reconstruction

Journal

IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS
Volume 29, Issue -, Pages 1943-1947

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LSP.2022.3205275

Keywords

Sensors; Generators; Decoding; Training; Image reconstruction; Image coding; Loss measurement; Information bottleneck; image compressed sens- ing; deep learning

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT) [20220238-001]
  2. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [20220238-001] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a novel training process that simultaneously learns the sensing and decoder networks using Information Bottleneck theory, to improve the reconstruction performance of image compressed sensing algorithms.
Image Compressed Sensing (CS) has achieved a lot of performance improvement thanks to advances in deep networks. The CS method is generally composed of a sensing and a decoder. The sensing and decoder networks have a significant impact on the reconstruction performance, and it is obvious that both two networks must be in harmony. However, previous studies have focused on designing the loss function considering only the decoder network. In this paper, we propose a novel training process that can learn sensing and decoder networks simultaneously using Information Bottleneck (IB) theory. By maximizing importance through proposed importance generator, the sensing network is trained to compress important information for image reconstruction of the decoder network. The representative experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method is applied in recently proposed CS algorithms and increases the reconstruction performance with large margin in all CS ratios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available