4.7 Article

Wide band gap thiophosphates ASrPS4 (A = Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs): cation size effect induced successive structural transformation

Journal

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
Volume 51, Issue 39, Pages 15067-15073

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2dt02321k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2019YFA0705201]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal thiophosphates have attracted significant research interest for their structural chemistry and potential applications in infrared functional materials. In this study, five quaternary Sr-based alkali metal thiophosphates were obtained and their structural comparison revealed transformation in symmetry due to cation size effects and coordination features. Experimental and theoretical results showed that these compounds have large band gaps and NaSrPS4 may be a potential infrared birefringent material.
Metal thiophosphates have aroused much research interest due to their structural chemistry and possible applications as infrared functional materials. In this study, five quaternary Sr-based alkali metal thiophosphates ASrPS(4) (A = Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs) were obtained. Their structural comparison shows that their symmetry undergoes transformation from tetragonal (I4(1)/acd) to monoclinic (P2(1)/c) to orthorhombic (Pnma) system, which is induced by the cation size effects and coordination features of different alkali metal cations. The experimental and theoretical results demonstrate that the band gaps of all title compounds are large, namely 3.6-3.9 eV (experimental results) and 3.78-4.12 eV (HSE06). Theoretical analyses indicate that the [PS4] group could be regarded as a good unit for designing wide band gap compounds, and the birefringence of NaSrPS4 is 0.08 at the fundemental 1064 nm wavelength, which shows that it may be a potential infrared birefringent material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available