4.7 Article

Catalytic asymmetric synthesis of medium-sized bridged biaryls

Journal

CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 58, Issue 79, Pages 11031-11044

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cc04000j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) India [02(0422)/21/EMR-II]
  2. Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) UK [R21-7389181735]
  3. INSPIRE DST India
  4. Indian Institute of Technology Jammu

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The asymmetric synthesis of medium-sized (seven- to nine-membered) bridged biaryl carbo- and heterocycles has always been challenging, resulting in underdeveloped methods compared to smaller ring structures. However, due to their configurational stability and wide applications, there has been an increasing interest in the catalytic enantioselective synthesis of these structures.
Despite the persistent presence of medium-sized (seven- to nine-membered) scaffolds in natural products and biologically active molecules, their asymmetric syntheses have always been considered a formidable task; therefore, they have remained underdeveloped when compared to the enantioselective synthesis of five- and six-membered ring scaffolds. One important class of such medium-sized ring frameworks includes seven- to nine-membered biaryl bridged carbo- and heterocycles. These medium-ring-sized biaryl frameworks possess more configurational stability than the related smaller ring structures and are common features of valuable natural products, bioactive compounds, chiral catalysts, and molecular motors. Due to these exciting properties and broad applications, over the last few years, the catalytic enantioselective synthesis of medium-sized bridged biaryls has seen an upsurge. This highlight article describes the development of organocatalysed and transition-metal catalysed transformations for procuring seven-, eight-, and nine-membered bridged biaryls bearing a chiral axis/one or more asymmetric carbon centres.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available