4.5 Article

Progress against Escherichia coli with the Oxazolidinone Class of Antibacterials: Test Case for a General Approach To Improving Whole-Cell Gram-Negative Activity

Journal

ACS INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages 405-426

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.6b00003

Keywords

Gram-negative; outer membrane permeability; oxazolidinones; efflux pump; porins

Funding

  1. Defense Threat Reduction Agency [HDTRA1-14-1-0019]
  2. American Cancer Society [RSG-12-161-01-DMC]
  3. NU Office of the Provost Dissertation Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Novel antibacterials with activity against the Gram-negative bacteria associated with nosocomial infections, including Escherichia coli and other Enterobacteriaceae, are urgently needed due to the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant strains. A major obstacle that has stalled progress on nearly all small-molecule classes with potential for activity against these species has been achieving sufficient whole-cell activity, a difficult challenge due to the formidable outer membrane and efflux barriers intrinsic to these species. Using a set of compound design principles derived from available information relating physicochemical properties to Gram-negative entry or activity, we synthesized and evaluated a focused library of oxazolidinone analogues, a currently narrow spectrum class of antibacterials active only against Gram-positive bacteria. In this series, we have explored the effectiveness for improving Gram-negative activity by identifying and combining beneficial structural modifications in the C-ring region. We have found polar and/or charge-carrying modifications that, when combined in hybrid C-ring analogues, appear to largely overcome the efflux and/or permeability barriers, resulting in improved Gram-negative activity. In particular, those analogues least effected by efflux and the permeation barrier had significant zwitterionic character.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available