3.8 Article

Fibroblasts Slow Conduction Velocity in a Reconstituted Tissue Model of Fibrotic Cardiomyopathy

Journal

ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages 3022-3028

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00576

Keywords

engineered heart tissue; electrophysiology; cardiomyocyte; myofibroblast; conduction velocity; Fluo-2

Funding

  1. NIH [R01HL109505]
  2. NSF [DGE-1143954]
  3. NSF through the NSF Center for Engineering MechanBiology [CMMI 1548571]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Myocardial function deteriorates over the course of fibrotic cardiomyopathy, because of electrophysiological and mechanical effects of myofibroblasts that are not completely understood. Although a range of experimental model systems and associated theoretical treatments exist at the levels of isolated cardiomyocytes and planar cocultures of myofibroblasts and cardiomyocytes, interactions between these cell types at the tissue level are less clear. We studied these interactions through an engineered heart tissue (EHT) model of fibrotic myocardium and a mathematical model of the effects of cellular composition on EHT impulse conduction velocity. The EHT model allowed for modulation of cardiomyocyte and myofibroblast volume fractions, and observation of cell behavior in a three-dimensional environment that is more similar to native heart tissue than is planar cell culture. The cardiomyocyte and myofibroblast volume fractions determined the retardation of impulse conduction (spread of the action potential) in EHTs as measured by changes of the fluorescence of the Ca2+ probe, Fluo-2. Interpretation through our model showed retardation far in excess of predictions by homogenization theory, with conduction ceasing far below the fibroblast volume fraction associated with steric percolation. Results point to an important multiscale structural role of myofibroblasts in attenuating impulse conduction in fibrotic cardiomyopathy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available