3.8 Article

3D Printing of Porous Cell-Laden Hydrogel Constructs for Potential Applications in Cartilage Tissue Engineering

Journal

ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
Volume 2, Issue 7, Pages 1200-1210

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00258

Keywords

cartilage; tissue engineering; Bioplotting; porous cell-laden hydrogel constructs; alginate

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201306240046]
  2. Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation (SHRF) [2784]
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [RGPIN-2014-05648]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydrogels are particularly attractive as scaffolding materials for cartilage tissue engineering because their high water content closely mimics the native extracellular matrix (ECM). Hydrogels can also provide a three-dimensional (3D) microenvironment for homogeneously suspended cells that retains their rounded morphology and thus facilitates chondrogenesis in cartilage tissue engineering. However, fabricating hydrogel scaffolds or cell laden hydrogel constructs with a predesigned external shape and internal structure that does not collapse remains challenging because of the low viscosity and high water content of hydrogel precursors. Here, we present a study on the fabrication of (cell-laden) alginate hydrogel constructs using a 3D bioplotting system supplemented with a submerged cross-linking process. Swelling, mechanical properties and protein release profiles were examined and tuned by controlling the initial cross-linking density. Porous cell-laden alginate hydrogel constructs were also fabricated and cell viability, cell proliferation, and cartilaginous ECM deposition were investigated. The fabrication technique and the hydrogel scaffolds obtained supported high cell viability and the deposition of cartilaginous ECM, demonstrating their potential for applications in the field of cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available