3.8 Proceedings Paper

INTEGRATING CONCEPTS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE EO4GEO BODY OF KNOWLEDGE

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B4-2022-53-2022

Keywords

Body of Knowledge; Artificial Intelligence; Machine Learning; Geocomputation; Concept model; Ontology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The EO4GEO Body of Knowledge (BoK) provides a conceptual framework for the Earth Observation and Geo-Information domain. This paper presents the integration of concepts related to Artificial Intelligence (AI) into the BoK, along with specific examples and training resources. AI plays a significant role in the EO/GI field.
The EO4GEO Body of Knowledge (BoK) forms a structure of concepts and relationships between them, describing the domain of Earth Observation and Geo-Information (EO/GI). Each concept carries a short description, a list of key literature references and a set of associated skills which are used for job profiling and curriculum building. As the EO/GI domain is evolving continuously, the BoK needs regular updates with new concepts embodying new trends, and deprecating concepts which are not relevant anymore. This paper presents the inclusion of BoK concepts related to Artificial Intelligence. This broad field of knowledge has links to several applications in EO/GI. Its connection to concepts, already existing in the BoK, needs special attention. To perform a clean and structural integration of the cross-cutting domain of AI, first a separate cluster of AI concepts was created, which was then merged with the existing BoK. The paper provides examples of this integration with specific concepts and examples of training resources in which AI-related concepts are used. Although the presented structure already provides a good starting point, the positioning of AI within the EO/GI-focussed BoK needs to be further enhanced with the help of expert calls as part of the BoK update cycle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available