4.5 Article

Endoscopic removal of over-the-scope clips: Clinical experience with a bipolar cutting device

Journal

UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 479-484

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/2050640616671846

Keywords

Endoscopic removal; over-the-scope clip; OTSC; remOVE system; bipolar cutting device

Funding

  1. Ovesco Endoscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) are increasingly used for the closure of perforations/fistulae, hemostasis and endoscopic full-thickness resection (FTRD system). When OTSC-associated complications occur or re-therapy at the OTSC site is needed, OTSC removal may be indicated. An experimental study in an animal model and a case series have shown good results for OTSC removal with a bipolar cutting device. We present a larger clinical study using this device. Methods: Data of all consecutive patients with indication for OTSC removal were collected and analyzed retrospectively. OTSCs were cut at two opposing sites using a bipolar grasping device to apply short direct current impulses. OTSC fragments were extracted with a standard forceps and a cap at the tip of the endoscope to avoid tissue damage. Results: Between December 2012 and February 2016 a total of 42 OTSC removals in the upper (n=25) and lower (n=17) gastrointestinal tract have been performed at our department. Overall technical success, defined as cutting the OTSC at two opposing sites and extraction of both fragments, was achieved in 92.9% (39/42) of all cases. Successful fragmentation of the OTSC was achieved in 97.6% (41/42). Minor bleedings were rare and could be managed endoscopically in all cases. There were no perforations and no major or delayed bleedings. Conclusion: Endoscopic OTSC removal with a bipolar cutting device is feasible, effective and safe. This technique can be applied in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available