4.6 Article

Transcranial-Direct-Current-Stimulation Accelerates Motor Recovery After Cortical Infarction in Mice: The Interplay of Structural Cellular Responses and Functional Recovery

Journal

NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR
Volume 36, Issue 10-11, Pages 701-714

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/15459683221124116

Keywords

experimental stroke; functional recovery; tDCS; microglia; photothrombosis

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [431549029SFB 1451]
  2. Koln-Fortune-Programm [158/2013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, it was found that tDCS can promote functional recovery after stroke by impacting cellular processes such as neurogenesis and microglial activation. Cathodal tDCS showed greater effects on functional recovery, neurogenesis, and microglial activation compared to anodal tDCS.
Background. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) promotes recovery after stroke in humans. The underlying mechanisms, however, remain to be elucidated. Animal models suggest tDCS effects on neuroinflammation, stem cell proliferation, neurogenesis, and neural plasticity. Objective. In a longitudinal study, we employed tDCS in the subacute and chronic phase after experimental focal cerebral ischemia in mice to explore the relationship between functional recovery and cellular processes. Methods. Mice received photothrombosis in the right motor cortex, verified by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. A composite neuroscore quantified subsequent functional deficits. Mice received tDCS daily: either 5 sessions from day 5 to 9, or 10 sessions with days 12 to 16 in addition. TDCS with anodal or cathodal polarity was compared to sham stimulation. Further imaging to assess proliferation and neuroinflammation was performed by immunohistochemistry at different time points and Positron Emission Tomography at the end of the observation time of 3 weeks. Results. Cathodal tDCS at 198 kC/m(2) (220A/m(2)) between days 5 and 9 accelerated functional recovery, increased neurogenesis, decreased microglial activation, and mitigated CD 16/32-expression associated with M1-phenotype. Anodal tDCS exerted similar effects on neurogenesis and microglial polarization but not on recovery of function or microglial activation. TDCS on days 12 to 16 after stroke did not induce any further effects, suggesting that the therapeutic time window was closed by then. Conclusion. Overall, data suggest that non-invasive neuromodulation by tDCS impacts neurogenesis and microglial activation as critical cellular processes influencing functional recovery during the early phase of regeneration from focal cerebral ischemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available