4.7 Article

Influence of the Electromagnetic Energy Due to Cellular Devices in a Multi-Layer Human Head under Two-Temperature Heat Conduction Model

Journal

MATHEMATICS
Volume 10, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math10183296

Keywords

two-temperature; human head; skin; bone; brain; relaxation time; electromagnetic energy

Categories

Funding

  1. Science, Technology & Innovation funding Authority (STDF), Basic and Applied Research Grants under Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Egypt [38132]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a mathematical model was created to evaluate the thermal reaction in the human head exposed to electromagnetic waves. The research found that the impact of electromagnetic waves emitted by cellular devices is more detrimental to the bones of children's heads than they are to the bones of adults' heads.
In this study, a mathematical model of a human head with three layers of skin, bone, and brain for both children and adults was created. The phase-lag time definition was used to evaluate the internal thermal reaction that is created via the human head as a result of chemical processes. In the framework of the two-temperature heat conduction model, the governing equations were developed. The inversions were numerically derived using an approximation approach after applying Laplace transforms. When the human head is exposed to cellular devices that emit an electromagnetic wave, the dynamic and conductive temperature increments distributions have been calculated and discussed with various values of the two-temperature parameter, time, relaxation time, power transmission frequency, and power density. Each layer of the human cranium is affected by all of the characteristics analysed. The impacts of electromagnetic waves emitted by cellular devices were more detrimental to the bones of children's heads than they are to the bones of adults' heads.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available