4.7 Article

Investigation of oxygen evolution reaction with Ni foam and stainless-steel mesh electrodes in alkaline seawater electrolysis

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.108486

Keywords

Alkaline seawater electrolysis; Oxygen evolution reaction; Stainless -steel mesh; Ni foam

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AC05-00OR22725DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  2. US DOE H2NEW consortium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the substrates for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) electrocatalysts in alkaline seawater electrolysis were investigated. It was found that the performance of stainless-steel mesh (SS mesh) was superior to that of Ni foam in terms of overpotentials and Tafel slopes, and it exhibited excellent stability. Interestingly, the performance of SS mesh even outperformed various non-noble metal electrocatalysts and was comparable to commercial RuO2 and IrO2. The corrosion conditions of Ni foam and SS mesh electrodes were also studied.
Alkaline seawater electrolysis is a promising method for hydrogen production; however, little progress has been made in investigating the substrates for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) electrocatalysts. Ni foam and stainless -steel mesh (SS mesh) were investigated systematically for OER in alkaline seawater electrolysis in this work. The overpotentials and Tafel slopes with SS meshes are smaller than Ni foams, and it also exhibits excellent stability. Interestingly, the performance of the SS mesh even outperforms various non-noble metal electrocatalysts and is comparable to commercial RuO2 and IrO2. The corrosion conditions of Ni foam and SS mesh electrodes were studied and revealed. Furthermore, the electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) of Ni foam is 12 times higher than SS mesh in the same geometric area, indicating the electrochemical activity of SS mesh is much superior to Ni foam. This work expands on promising substrates for alkaline seawater electrolysis, with cost and performance advantages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available