4.7 Article

Measurements of protons and charged pions emitted from νμ charged-current interactions on iron at a mean neutrino energy of 1.49 GeV using a nuclear emulsion detector

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 106, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.032016

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology in Japan (MEXT)
  2. Institute of Materials and Systems for Sustainability, Nagoya University
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [JP16H00873, JP18K03680, JP17H02888, JP18H03701, JP18H05537, JP18H05541]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a detailed measurement and analysis of protons, muons, and charged pions emitted from nu(mu) charged-current interactions on iron using a nuclear emulsion detector. The measured data were compared to Monte Carlo predictions, revealing significant differences.
This study conducted an analysis of muons, protons, and charged pions emitted from nu(mu) charged-current interactions on iron using a nuclear emulsion detector. The emulsion detector with a 65 kg iron target was exposed to a neutrino beam corresponding to 4.0 x 10(19) protons on target with a mean neutrino energy of 1.49 GeV. The measurements were performed at a momentum threshold of 200 (50) MeV/c for protons (pions), which are the lowest momentum thresholds attempted up to now. The measured quantities are the multiplicities, emission angles, and momenta of the muons, protons, and charged pions. In addition to these inclusive measurements, exclusive measurements such as the muon-proton emission-angle correlations of specific channels and the opening angle between the protons of CCO pi 2p events were performed. The data were compared to Monte Carlo predictions and some significant differences were observed. The results of the study demonstrate the capability of detailed measurements of neutrino-nucleus interactions using a nuclear emulsion detector to improve neutrino interaction models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available