4.7 Article

Beyond Lambertian light trapping for large-area silicon solar cells: fabrication methods

Journal

OPTO-ELECTRONIC ADVANCES
Volume 5, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

CAS, INST OPTICS & ELECTRONICS, ED OFF OPTO-ELECTRONIC JOURNALS
DOI: 10.29026/oea.2022.210086

Keywords

silicon solar cells; laser ablation; light trapping; Lambertian limit; Introduction

Categories

Funding

  1. Nano -Processing Facility (NPF) , AIST, Tsukuba, Japan
  2. ARC [DP190103284]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Light trapping photonic crystal (PhC) patterns on the surface of Si solar cells provide a novel opportunity for approaching the theoretical efficiency limit. Two surface patterning methods are compared, along with electron beam lithography. Spectral characterization of the PhC light trapping is also discussed.
Light trapping photonic crystal (PhC) patterns on the surface of Si solar cells provides a novel opportunity to approach the theoretical efficiency limit of 32.3%, for light-to-electrical power conversion with a single junction cell. This is beyond the efficiency limit implied by the Lambertian limit of ray trapping - 29%. The interference and slow light effects are harnessed for collecting light even at the long wavelengths near the Si band-gap. We compare two different methods for surface patterning, that can be extended to large area surface patterning: 1) laser direct write and 2) step-&-repeat 5x reduction projection lithography. Large area throughput limitations of these methods are compared with the established electron beam lithography (EBL) route, which is conventionally utilised but much slower than the presented methods. Spectral characterisation of the PhC light trapping is compared for samples fabricated by different methods. Reflectance of Si etched via laser patterned mask was - 7% at visible wavelengths and was comparable with Si patterned via EBL made mask. The later pattern showed a stronger absorbance than the Lambertian limit6.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available