4.4 Article

From clinical to molecular diagnosis: relevance of diagnostic strategy in two cases of branchio-oto-renal syndrome - case report

Journal

ITALIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13052-022-01369-5

Keywords

Branchio-oto-renal syndrome; Deafness; EYA1; Copy number variation; case report

Categories

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Health -Current research IRCCS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports two patients with clinical features of Branchio-oto-renal syndrome (BOR), who were found to have a 2.65 Mb 8q13.2-13.3 microdeletion through CNV analysis. This highlights the importance of CNV analysis in diagnosing BOR syndrome when sequencing for BOR genes is negative. Furthermore, the deletion of PRDM14 and NCOA2 genes, which are involved in regulation of fertility, suggests the need for longer follow-up to monitor fertility issues or additional clinical findings.
Background Branchio-oto-renal syndrome (BOR) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by deafness, branchiogenic malformations and renal abnormalities. Pathogenic variants in EYA1, SIX1 and SIX5 genes cause almost half of cases; copy number variants (CNV) and complex genomic rearrangements have been revealed in about 20% of patients, but they are not routinely and commonly included in the diagnostic work-up. Case presentation We report two unrelated patients with BOR syndrome clinical features, negative sequencing for BOR genes and the identification of a 2.65 Mb 8q13.2-13.3 microdeletion. Conclusions We highlight the value of CNV analyses in high level of suspicion for BOR syndrome but negative sequencing for BOR genes and we propose an innovative diagnostic flow-chart to increase current detection rate. Our report confirms a mechanism of non-allelic homologous recombination as causing this recurrent 8q13.2-13.3 microdeletion. Moreover, considering the role of PRDM14 and NCOA2 genes, both involved in regulation of fertility and deleted in our patients, we suggest the necessity of a longer follow-up to monitor fertility issues or additional clinical findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available