4.7 Article

Finite-size scaling of critical avalanches

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
Volume 106, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.106.014148

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. SERB, DST, Government of India [ECR/2017/001702]
  2. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/IF180689]
  3. University Grants Commission (UGC) , India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examine the probability distribution of avalanche sizes in self-organized critical systems. Our investigation reveals that while a power-law distribution is common, it may also decrease with increasing system size at a fixed avalanche size. We implement the scaling method and identify scaling functions to estimate the critical exponents and distinguish between exponents related to avalanche size and system size.
We examine probability distribution for avalanche sizes observed in self-organized critical systems. While a power-law distribution with a cutoff because of finite system size is typical behavior, a systematic investigation reveals that it may also decrease with increasing the system size at a fixed avalanche size. We implement the scaling method and identify scaling functions. The data collapse ensures a correct estimation of the critical exponents and distinguishes two exponents related to avalanche size and system size. Our simple analysis provides striking implications. While the exact value for avalanches size exponent remains elusive for the prototype sandpile on a square lattice, we suggest the exponent should be 1. The simulation results represent that the distribution shows a logarithmic system size dependence, consistent with the normalization condition. We also argue that for the train or Oslo sandpile model with bulk drive, the avalanche size exponent is slightly less than 1, which differs significantly from the previous estimate of 1.11.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available