4.6 Review

Prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis with probiotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

PEERJ
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2429

Keywords

Probiotics; Necrotizing enterocolitis; Lactobacillus; Bifidobacterium; Saccharomyces; Extremely premature; Newborn; Infant; Premature; Enterocolitis

Funding

  1. Pharmacy Department, London Health Sciences Centre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the most frequent gastrointestinal emergency in neonates. The microbiome of the preterm gut may regulate the integrity of the intestinal mucosa. Probiotics may positively contribute to mucosal integrity, potentially reducing the risk of NEC in neonates. Objective To perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of probiotics for the prevention of NEC in premature infants. Data Sources. Structured searches were performed in: Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (all via Ovid, from 2013 to January 2015). Clinical trial registries and electronically available conference materials were also searched. An updated search was conducted June 3, 2016. Study Selection. Randomized trials including infants less than 37 weeks gestational age or less than 2,500 g on probiotic vs. standard therapy. Data Extraction. Data extraction of the newly-identified trials with a double check of the previously-identified trials as performed using a standardized data collection tool. Results. Thirteen additional trials (n = 5,033) were found. The incidence of severe NEC (RR 0.53 95% CI [0.42-0.66]) and all cause mortality (RR 0.79 95% CI [0.68-0.93]) were reduced. No difference was shown in culture-proven sepsis RR 0.88 95% CI [0.77-1.00]. Limitations. Heterogeneity of organisms and dosihg regimens studied prevent a species-specific treatment recommendation from being made. Conclusions. Preterm infants benefit from probiotics to prevent severe NEC and death.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available