4.0 Article

Ranibizumab 0.3 mg for Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema After Recent, Frequent, and Chronic Bevacizumab: The ROTATE Trial

Journal

OPHTHALMIC SURGERY LASERS & IMAGING RETINA
Volume 47, Issue 11, Pages 1-18

Publisher

SLACK INC
DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20161031-07

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Genentech
  2. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
  3. Acucela
  4. Alcon Laboratories
  5. Allergan
  6. GlaxoSmithKline
  7. Ophthotech Corporation
  8. Pfizer
  9. Roche
  10. ThromboGenics
  11. Del Mar Pharmaceuticals
  12. Chiltern International
  13. Neurotech Pharmaceuticals
  14. Xcovery
  15. Alimera Sciences
  16. Neurotech Pharmaceutical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 0.3 mg ranibizumab (Lucentis; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) in eyes with persistent diabetic macular edema (DME) after recent, chronic, and frequent bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Open-label, prospective study of 0.3 mg ranibizumab for eyes with persistent DME after bevacizumab. Thirty eyes randomized to a sustained group or a pro re nata (PRN) dosing group. RESULTS: The mean change in ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to 1 year was +6.7 letters in the sustained group, +6.4 letters in the PRN group, and +6.5 letters overall. There was an overall mean reduction of 116 mu m from baseline central subfield thickness at 1 year, with -92 mu m and -127 mu m decreases in the sustained and PRN groups, respectively. Adverse events included two deaths; one patient with multiple cardiopulmonary comorbidities, myocardial infarction, stroke, osteomyelitis; and mild posterior subcapsular cataracts in two eyes. CONCLUSION: Ranibizumab 0.3 mg demonstrated improved visual and anatomic outcomes in patients with persistent DME following bevacizumab.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available