4.6 Article

Towards high-resolution X-ray scattering as a probe of electron correlation

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 24, Issue 39, Pages 24542-24552

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cp02933b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council UK (EPSRC) [EP/V006819, EP/V049240, EP/V006746, EP/P001459, EP/T021675]
  2. Leverhulme Trust [RPG-2020-208]
  3. Erling-Persson Family Foundation
  4. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  5. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0020276]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0020276] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article examines the calculation methods of X-ray scattering cross sections and the impact of correlation on scattering signals. The results suggest that a more correlated wavefunction can improve the accuracy of scattering, the multireference character affects the scattering signals, and the inelastic and total scattering components are most sensitive to the strength of correlation.
X-ray scattering cross sections are calculated using a range of increasingly correlated methods: Hartree-Fock (HF), complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF), Monte Carlo configuration interaction (MCCI), and full configuration interaction (FCI). Even for the seemingly straightforward case of ground state Ne, the accuracy of the total scattering is significantly better with a more correlated wavefunction. Scanning the bond distance in ground state CO shows that the total scattering signal tracks the multireference character. We examine the convergence of the elastic, inelastic, and total scattering of O-3. Overall, the inelastic and total components are found to be the most sensitive to the strength of correlation. Our results suggest that highly accurate measurement of X-ray scattering could provide a sensitive probe of pair-wise correlation between electrons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available