4.6 Article

Optimality of any pair of incompatible rank-one projective measurements for some nontrivial Bell inequality

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 106, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.106.032219

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union under the European Regional Development Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bell nonlocality is a significant departure of quantum mechanics from classical physics, showing that quantum correlations between spacelike separated systems are stronger than classical correlations. A recent study proposed a family of Bell functionals tailored to mutually unbiased bases (MUBs) and generalized it to an arbitrary incompatible pair of rank-one projective measurements. They demonstrated that there exists a Bell inequality that is maximally violated by any such pair of measurements and showed that the most noise-resilient realization is not generated by MUBs.
Bell nonlocality represents one of the most striking departures of quantum mechanics from classical physics. It shows that correlations between spacelike separated systems allowed by quantum mechanics are stronger than those present in any classical theory. In a recent work [A. Tavakoli, M. Farkas, D. Rosset, J.-D. Bancal, and J. Kaniewski, Sci. Adv. 7, eabc3847 (2021)], a family of Bell functionals tailored to mutually unbiased bases (MUBs) was proposed. For these functionals, the maximal quantum violation is achieved if the two measure-ments performed by one of the parties are constructed out of MUBs of a fixed dimension. Here, we generalize this construction to an arbitrary incompatible pair of rank-one projective measurements. By constructing a new family of Bell functionals, we show that for any such pair there exists a Bell inequality that is maximally violated by this pair. Moreover, when investigating the robustness of these violations to noise, we demonstrate that the realization which is most robust to noise is not generated by MUBs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available