4.2 Article

Current practices in pediatric hospital-acquired thromboembolism: Survey of the Children's Hospital Acquired Thrombosis (CHAT) Consortium

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12793

Keywords

anticoagulants; hospital; pediatric; risk assessment; risk factors; venous thromboembolism

Funding

  1. Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Society
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1TR001855]
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [5T32HL007149]
  4. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America
  5. Children's Hospital Saban Research Mentored Career Development Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Practices and risk assessment for preventing hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE) in pediatric hospitals vary, highlighting the need for further research and consensus.
Background A rise in hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE) in children has led to increased awareness regarding VTE prophylaxis and risk assessment. Despite this, no consensus exists regarding these practices in pediatrics. Objective To describe common practices in VTE prophylaxis, VTE risk assessment models, and anticoagulation dosing strategies in pediatric hospitals that are members of the Children's Hospital Acquired Thrombosis (CHAT) Consortium. Methods An electronic survey of 44 questions evaluating practices surrounding pediatric HA-VTE risk assessment and prevention was distributed between August 9, 2021, and August 30, 2021, to the primary investigators from the 32 institutions within the CHAT Consortium. Results The survey response rate was 100% (n = 32). In total, 85% (n = 27) of the institutions assess HA-VTE, but only 63% (n = 20) have formal hospital guidelines. Within the institutions with formal guidelines, 100% (n = 20) include acute systemic inflammation or infection and presence of a central venous catheter (CVC) as risk factors for VTE. Pharmacologic prophylaxis is prescribed at 87% (28) of institutions, with enoxaparin being the most frequent (96%, n = 27). Variability in responses persisted regarding risk factors, risk assessment, thromboprophylaxis, dosing of prophylactic anticoagulation or anticoagulant drug monitoring. A majority of providers were comfortable providing thromboprophylaxis across all age groups. In addition, the global coronavirus disease 2019 increased the providers' use of prophylactic anticoagulation 78% (n = 25). Conclusion Practices among institutions are variable in regard to use of HA-VTE prophylaxis, risk assessment, or guideline implementation, highlighting the need for further research and a validated risk assessment model through groups like the CHAT Consortium.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available