4.7 Article

Accurate Quantification of Anthocyanin in Red Flesh Apples Using Digital Photography and Image Analysis

Journal

HORTICULTURAE
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae8020145

Keywords

Malus x domestica; anthocyanin; red flesh; photography; image analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a method for predicting anthocyanin content in red fleshed apples from digital images. By scanning or photographing the flesh discs and using calibration lines and color correction algorithms, the anthocyanin content can be accurately predicted.
Red fleshed apples (Malus x domestica Borkh.) differ in colour intensity between cultivars, seasons and sites. The objective of this study was to develop a procedure for predicting anthocyanin content from digital images of flesh discs. Flesh cylinders of uniform colour were excised, scanned and their colours determined in the R, G and B and the L*a*b* colour spaces. Anthocyanin content was also quantified chemically. A calibration line was constructed to predict anthocyanin content of flesh discs of varying colour from a scan or a photograph in the studio or outdoors. Anthocyanin concentration was linearly related to the logarithms of G, B and L*. From these relationships, the anthocyanin content of a flesh disc was predicted, pixel by pixel. Colour corrections were applied using a reference colour chart included in all images. The Finlayson algorithm was most effective for correcting the G parameter obtained by a flatbed scanner. For variable imaging methods (scanning or photography), the Vandermonde algorithm for correcting the L* parameter and the Finlayson algorithm for correcting the G parameter were most effective in predicting anthocyanin content. The procedure allows accurate prediction of anthocyanin content of red fleshed apples from simple colour scans or photographs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available