4.7 Article

Simulation of CO2 capture process in gas-solid bubbling fluidized bed by computational mass transfer

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.108548

Keywords

Gas -solid bubbling fluidized bed; CO 2 capture; Computational mass transfer; Simulation; Turbulent mass diffusion

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFE0111100]
  2. NSFC [22078230]
  3. Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering [SKL-ChE-21B07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper adopts a recently developed two-equation turbulent model based on computational mass transfer (CMT) to simulate the capture process of carbon dioxide by potassium carbonate particles in a gas-solid bubbling fluidized bed. The model uses auxiliary equations to determine the turbulent mass diffusion of species, providing a more rigorous simulation compared to empirical turbulent Schmidt number models. The simulated results show satisfactory agreement with experimental data, confirming the validity of the model. Additionally, the paper characterizes and discusses the turbulent mass diffusion in the bubbling fluidized bed.
In this paper, a recently developed two-equation turbulent (TET) model based on the methodology of compu-tational mass transfer (CMT) [1] is adopted to simulate the capture process of carbon dioxide by potassium carbonate particles in a gas-solid bubbling fluidized bed (BFB). The TET model uses two auxiliary equations, namely the concentration variance equation and its dissipation rate equation to determine the turbulent mass diffusion of species, which enables the simulation on mass transfer process be more rigorous than that based on empirical turbulent Schmidt number model. Comparison between the simulated results and experimental data in literature is made, which shows a satisfactory agreement (AARD% are 2.47 % and 8.45 % respectively for two cases of simulation) and thus verifies the validity of the model. Furthermore, the turbulent mass diffusion in the BFB is characterized and discussed. The calculated turbulent Schmidt number by the present model varies along axial and radial directions (with averaged value of 0.32), revealing that the use of constant turbulent Schmidt number (i.e., 0.7) is only an approximate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available