4.3 Article

Preparation and Characterization of High-Quality USb2 Thin Films on Graphene/6H-SiC(0001)

Journal

RARE METAL MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING
Volume 51, Issue 8, Pages 2721-2726

Publisher

NORTHWEST INST NONFERROUS METAL RESEARCH

Keywords

USb2 thin films; STM; ARPES; electronic structure

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0303104]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11904335, 11974319, 21903074, 11774320, 11904334, 12122409, 11874330]
  3. Special Funds of Institute of Materials [TP02201905]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-quality USb2 thin films were successfully prepared on graphene/6H-SiC(0001) surface by molecule beam epitaxy, exhibiting similar surface atomic structure, electric transport property and band structure to those of bulk USb2 single crystals.
Heavy fermion systems can exhibit abundant attractive quantum ground states by tuning external parameters such as dimension. High-quality USb2 thin films were prepared on graphene/6H-SiC(0001) surface by molecule beam epitaxy. Combining the reflection high energy electron diffraction, X-ray diffraction, electric transport and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements, it is demonstrated that the grown USb2 films are high-quality single crystals. Furthermore, the surface topography, atomic structure and band structures of USb2 films were characterized by scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and angle-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy (ARPES). Results show that the surface atomic structure, electric transport property and band structure of the grown USb2 films are similar to those of bulk USb2 single crystals. The preparation and characterization of high-quality USb2 films provide precious experimental experiences for exploring fantastic properties of low-dimensional uranium-based heavy fermion systems by growing ultrathin films with desirable thickness in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available