4.5 Article

ixpeobssim: A simulation and analysis framework for the imaging X-ray polarimetry explorer

Journal

SOFTWAREX
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.softx.2022.101194

Keywords

X-ray polarimetry

Funding

  1. Italian Space Agency (ASI) [ASI-OHBI-2017-12-I.0, ASI-INAF-2017-12-H0, ASI-INFN-2017.13-H0]
  2. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF)
  3. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) in Italy
  4. EU Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant [734303]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ixpeobssim is a simulation and analysis framework developed specifically for IXPE, capable of producing realistic simulated observations and supporting the analysis of polarized X-ray sources.
ixpeobssim is a simulation and analysis framework specifically developed for the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE). Given a source model and the response functions of the telescopes, it is designed to produce realistic simulated observations, in the form of event lists in FITS format, containing a strict superset of the information included in the publicly released IXPE data products. The core simulation capabilities are complemented by a full suite of post-processing applications which support the spatial, spectral, and temporal models needed for analysis of typical polarized Xray sources, allowing for the implementation of complex, polarization-aware analysis pipelines, and facilitating the interoperation with the standard visualization and analysis tools traditionally in use by the X-ray community. Although much of the framework is specific to IXPE, the modular nature of the underlying implementation makes it potentially straightforward to adapt it to different missions with polarization capabilities. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available