4.3 Article

Neuromyelitis optica-relapses: Race and rate, immunosuppression and impairment

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages 21-25

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.02.014

Keywords

Devic's syndrome; Neuromyelitis optica; Immunosuppression; Cohort study

Funding

  1. UK National Specialised Commissioning Team

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is a rare antibody-mediated CNS disease characterised by disabling relapses leading to high morbidity and mortality. Understanding relapse activity and severity is important for treatment decisions and clinical trial design. We assessed (1) whether clinical and demographic factors associate with different relapse rates and (2) the relative impact of immunosuppressive treatments on relapse rates and on attack-related residual disability. Methods: Clinical, demographic and treatment data were prospectively collected from 79 consecutive aquaporin 4 antibody positive patients seen in the nationally commissioned Oxford NMO service. The influence of clinical features on annualised relapse rates (using multiple regression) and the effect of immunosuppression on relapse-associated residual disability for transverse myelitis and optic neuritis attacks (using a mixed effect model) were analysed. Results: The mean annualised relapse rate was 0.93. Relapse rates were significantly higher in AfroCaribbeans, children and in those of shorter disease duration. Relapse rates reduced on treatment (from 0.87 to 0.42). Delay to first treatment did not influence eventual on-treatment relapse rate. Immunosuppressive treatment significantly reduced the residual disability from ON (p < 0.01), and TM (p= 0.029) attacks. Conclusions: Relapse rates in NMO are influenced by multiple factors, including age, ethnicity and disease duration. Current immunosuppressive treatments reduce but do not abolish relapses, however, they appear to additionally lessen the chronic disabling effect of a relapse. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available