3.8 Proceedings Paper

Deformation measurement system for the fuselage of an unmanned aircraft vehicle

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/MetroAeroSpace54187.2022.9856371

Keywords

strength tests; deformation measurement; optical displacement and deformation analysis; ARAMIS; UAV

Funding

  1. Polish National Centre for Research and Development [LIDER/27/0140/L-10/18/NCBR/2019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the research possibilities of a test stand for testing deformations of unmanned aerial vehicle fuselages. The test stand can simulate different flight conditions and verify the maximum deformation of the fuselage, allowing for necessary modifications to increase its stiffness.
The paper presents a description of the research possibilities of the developed test stand for testing deformations of unmanned aerial vehicle fuselages. The test stand was developed to realize a project of a unique construction of an unmanned aerial vehicle. This design determined the requirements for the test stand. Therefore, part of the work was devoted to the description of the tested object. Due to the specific working conditions of the designed fuselage, the developed test stand allows for simulating the load corresponding to different conditions of the flight, e.g. hovering or progressive flight. Additionally, it is possible to change the forces acting on the fuselage simultaneously for all servos or each of them separately (if necessary). Finally, example results showing the displacement of control points in one of the observed parts of the fuselage are presented. The tests carried out using the developed test stand allowed to verify the maximum deformation of the fuselage. Based on the results obtained it is possible to define necessary modifications to increase the stiffness of the tested object, i.e. to reduce the level of deformations while keeping the mass requirements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available