3.8 Article

Cannabis use and patterns of psychotic symptomatology in a longitudinal birth cohort

Journal

NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 135, Issue 1562, Pages 25-33

Publisher

NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01001.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is no evidence of qualitative differences in the pattern of psychotic symptomatology reported by non-cannabis users and regular cannabis users. Commonly reported symptoms are mild and severe symptoms are not commonly reported.
AIM: Research has established associations between regular cannabis use and psychotic symptomatology in young people. However, there has been little previous research on whether the experience of psychotic symptomatology differs between non-users and regular users of cannabis. METHOD: Data were from the Christchurch Health and Development Study (CHDS), a longitudinal cohort born in 1977. Data on frequency of cannabis use and (past month) psychotic symptomatology were obtained at the age 18, 21 and 25 waves of assessment. Symptoms were rank ordered by the number of affirmative responses over the three assessments, and the symptom profile of non-users and regular users were compared using a non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Among non-users and regular users, the commonly reported symptoms of psychosis were those that would be considered mild. More severe symptoms were not commonly reported. A comparison of the symptom profile across the two groups showed no significant differences. CONCLUSION: There was no evidence of qualitative differences in the pattern of psychotic symptomatology reported by non-cannabis users and regular cannabis users. Although regular cannabis users tend to report a greater number of symptoms, these symptoms did not tend to be severe, and were unlikely to be indicative of psychotic illness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available