4.7 Article

Erythropoietin Receptor (EPOR) Signaling in the Osteoclast Lineage Contributes to EPO-Induced Bone Loss in Mice

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms231912051

Keywords

erythropoietin (EPO); osteoclasts; erythropoietin receptor (EPOR); bone; CD115

Funding

  1. Israel Science Foundation (ISF) [1188/21]
  2. ISF [1086/17]
  3. Dotan Hemato-oncology Fund
  4. Cancer Biology Research Center
  5. Tel Aviv University
  6. German-Israel Foundation (GIF) [I-1433-203.12/2017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates that EPOR in the monocytic lineage is at least partially responsible for the effect of EPO on bone loss.
Erythropoietin (EPO) is a pleiotropic cytokine that classically drives erythropoiesis but can also induce bone loss by decreasing bone formation and increasing resorption. Deletion of the EPO receptor (EPOR) on osteoblasts or B cells partially mitigates the skeletal effects of EPO, thereby implicating a contribution by EPOR on other cell lineages. This study was designed to define the role of monocyte EPOR in EPO-mediated bone loss, by using two mouse lines with conditional deletion of EPOR in the monocytic lineage. Low-dose EPO attenuated the reduction in bone volume (BV/TV) in Cx3cr1(Cre) EPORf/f female mice (27.05%) compared to controls (39.26%), but the difference was not statistically significant. To validate these findings, we increased the EPO dose in LysM(Cre) model mice, a model more commonly used to target preosteoclasts. There was a significant reduction in both the increase in the proportion of bone marrow preosteoclasts (CD115(+)) observed following high-dose EPO administration and the resulting bone loss in LysM(Cre) EPORf/f female mice (44.46% reduction in BV/TV) as compared to controls (77.28%), without interference with the erythropoietic activity. Our data suggest that EPOR in the monocytic lineage is at least partially responsible for driving the effect of EPO on bone mass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available