Comparison of systematic randomized 12-core transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasonography fusion-targeted prostate biopsy

We aimed to compare the complications and pathological outcomes between systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB) and magnetic resonance imaging-TRUS fusion targeted prostate biopsy (MRI-TRUS FTPB). We examined 10,901 patients who underwent prostate biopsy from May 2003 to December 2017 retrospectively. Among them, 10,325 patients underwent 12-core TRUS-PB and 576 patients underwent MRI-TRUS FTPB. The clinicopathological features and complications in both groups were compared. After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in the clinical features and complication rates between both groups (P > .05). In the multivariate analyses, the prostate volume was shown to be the only significant predictor of overall complications, infectious complications, bleeding related complications, and Clavien-Dindo grade >= 2 complications after prostate biopsy (P < .001). The present study demonstrates the safety of MRI-TRUS FTPB in terms of complications, compared with that of TRUS-PB. Although the combination of MRI-TRUS FTPB and 12-core TRUS-PB provides enhanced diagnostic power, MRI-TRUS FGB alone could provide a reasonable diagnostic value for prostate cancer if the apparent diffusion coefficient suspicious grade of prostate cancer is >= 4. When the Likert suspicious grade of prostate cancer on the apparent diffusion coefficient map of multiparametric MRI was 3, 13.9% (27/194) of the patients were diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa); 44.4% (12/27) of them were confirmed as csPCa at the MRI-targeted cores. When the apparent diffusion coefficient suspicious grade was >= 4, 43.0% (108/251) were diagnosed with csPCa; 76.8% (83/108) of them were confirmed to have csPCa at the MRI-targeted cores.

Automated summary

This study compared the complications and pathological outcomes between TRUS-PB and MRI-TRUS FTPB, and found that MRI-TRUS FTPB is as safe as TRUS-PB in terms of complications. Additionally, the study showed that prostate volume is an important predictor of complications after prostate biopsy.