4.1 Review

Optimizing the Personalized Care for the Management of Rectal Cancer: A Consensus Statement

Journal

TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 8, Pages 627-+

Publisher

AVES
DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2022.211103

Keywords

Consensus; evidence-based data; rectal cancer; treatment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in Turkey and current guidelines lack sufficient information for its management. To address uncertainties in the management, a consensus program was developed with the participation of physicians from Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar and Koc Universities. The program covered various aspects of colorectal cancer management and decisions were made based on existing data.
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in Turkey. The current guidelines do not provide sufficient information to cover all aspects of the management of rectal cancer. Although treatment has been standardized in terms of the basic principles of neoadjuvant, surgical, and adjuvant therapy, uncertainties in the management of rectal cancer may lead to significant differences in clinical practice. In order to clarify these uncertainties, a consensus program was constructed with the participation of the physicians from the Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar and Koc Universities. This program included the physicians from the departments of general surgery, gastroenterology, pathology, radiology, nuclear medicine, medical oncology, radiation oncology, and medical genetics. The gray zones in the management of rectal cancer were determined by reviewing the evidence-based data and current guidelines before the meeting. Topics to be discussed consisted of diagnosis, staging, surgical treatment for the primary disease, use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment, management of recurrent disease, screening, follow-up, and genetic counseling. All those topics were discussed under supervision of a presenter and a chair with active participation of related physicians. The consensus text was structured by centralizing the decisions based on the existing data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available