4.6 Article

Learning anisotropic interaction rules from individual trajectories in a heterogeneous cellular population

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE
Volume 19, Issue 195, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0412

Keywords

cell migration; cell classification; interacting particle system; equation learning; weak-form sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers have developed the WSINDy method to learn equations for communities of cells and classify them using a novel scheme. The method demonstrates efficiency and proficiency through various test scenarios.
Interacting particle system (IPS) models have proven to be highly successful for describing the spatial movement of organisms. However, it is challenging to infer the interaction rules directly from data. In the field of equation discovery, the weak-form sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics (WSINDy) methodology has been shown to be computationally efficient for identifying the governing equations of complex systems from noisy data. Motivated by the success of IPS models to describe the spatial movement of organisms, we develop WSINDy for the second-order IPS to learn equations for communities of cells. Our approach learns the directional interaction rules for each individual cell that in aggregate govern the dynamics of a heterogeneous population of migrating cells. To sort a cell according to the active classes present in its model, we also develop a novel ad hoc classification scheme (which accounts for the fact that some cells do not have enough evidence to accurately infer a model). Aggregated models are then constructed hierarchically to simultaneously identify different species of cells present in the population and determine best-fit models for each species. We demonstrate the efficiency and proficiency of the method on several test scenarios, motivated by common cell migration experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available