Journal
SUSTAINABILITY IN ENERGY AND BUILDINGS 2021
Volume 263, Issue -, Pages 465-477Publisher
SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-6269-0_39
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation
- Centre for Technological and Industrial Development (CDTI) [CER20191019]
- European Union [864374, AIM1889410]
- Danish Energy Agency under the Energy Technology Development and Demonstration Program (EUDP) [64020-1007]
- Canada Excellence Research Chairs Program - Canada's Tri-Agency Institutional Program Secretariat
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper collects and analyzes the challenges and limitations of energy modeling software for assessing PEDs through five case studies in Italy, Spain, The Netherlands, Denmark, and Canada.
Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) have the potential of accelerating the decarbonization of urban areas and promoting scalability between cities. The development and real-world implementation of such innovative concepts can be enhanced through urban energy modelling. However, assessing PEDs can be challenging, and information on this topic is scarce and fragmented. The main contribution of this paper is collecting and analyzing challenges and limitations of energy modelling software for assessing PEDs through five case studies in Italy, Spain, The Netherlands, Denmark and Canada. Case studies are assessed first from a modelling approach, then the main identified challenges and limitations of modelling tools for PEDs are discussed, and finally, various ongoing trends and research needs in this field are suggested.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available
Share Paper
