4.6 Article

Mo3(C6O6)2 monolayer as a promising electrocatalyst for the CO2 reduction reaction: a first-principles study

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 24, Issue 41, Pages 25639-25647

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cp01369j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20190744]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21903046, 22222304]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the potential of Mo-3(C6O6)(2) monolayers as electrocatalysts for the CO2 reduction reaction (CRR) using first principles calculations. The Mo centers are found to be active sites that selectively promote CRR and produce methane. Coordination with hydroxyl further enhances the catalytic activity and lowers the thermodynamic barrier.
Designing electrocatalysts with good electrical conductivity, low cost, and abundant surface active sites to actively and selectively catalyze the CO2 reduction reaction (CRR) is crucial for mitigating the impact of high carbon emissions. By performing first principles calculations, the potential of Mo-3(C6O6)(2) monolayers as CRR electrocatalysts was explored by systematically examining the thermodynamic processes of all possible elementary steps. The Mo centers turn out to be the active sites that can selectively promote CRR and produce methane as the main product. The limiting potential for the potential-determining step (PDS) of the first reaction cycle is -0.58 V, less negative than that of the widely studied Cu(211) surface (-0.74 V). For subsequent reaction cycles, the Mo sites tend to coordinate with hydroxyl, which can further promote the CRR and lower the thermodynamic barrier of the PDS to 0.39 eV and suppress the side reaction of hydrogen evolution. With good conductivity and high catalytic activity and selectivity, the hydroxyl terminated Mo-3(C6O6)(2) monolayer is predicted to be an effective electrocatalyst for CRR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available