4.6 Article

Association between borderline neonatal thyroid-stimulating hormone concentrations and educational and developmental outcomes: a population-based record-linkage study

Journal

LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 4, Issue 9, Pages 756-765

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30122-X

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [APP1050688]
  2. NHMRC Early Career Fellowship [APP1054751]
  3. NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship [APP1021025]
  4. NHMRC Career Development Fellowship [APP1067066]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Congenital hypothyroidism causes intellectual delay unless identified and effectively treated soon after birth. Newborn screening has almost eliminated intellectual disability associated with congenital hypothyroidism. However, clinical uncertainty remains about infants with thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) concentrations less than the newborn screening cutoffs. We assessed the association between neonatal TSH concentrations and educational and developmental outcomes. Methods We did a population-based record-linkage study of all liveborn infants undergoing newborn screening from 1994 to 2008 in New South Wales, Australia, with assessments of childhood development or school performance. Very-low-birthweight babies (<1500 g)were excluded. Developmental and educational outcomes were obtained and these were linked to individual records by the New South Wales Centre for Health Record Linkage. The primary educational outcome was the proportion of students with National Assessment Program Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) results lower than the national minimum standard in reading or numeracy measured at all ages, and the primary developmental outcome was the proportion of children who were classified as being developmentally high risk (vulnerable in two or more of the five developmental domains assessed by the Australian Early Development Census) at age 4-6 years. The proportions of infants with each outcome were calculated per percentile (0-100) of TSH concentration. Multivariable logistic regression was used to account for potential confounding by maternal and fetal variables known to affect neonatal TSH concentrations or neurodevelopmental outcomes. Findings 503 706 infants had a neonatal TSH result that linked to a developmental or educational outcome. 149 569 infants born between 2002 and 2008 were linked to an Australian Early Development Census developmental outcome and 354 137 were linked to a NAPLAN educational outcome. Median follow-up for educational outcome was 10 years (IQR 8-12) and for developmental outcome was 5 years (5-6). 5.5%(14 137 of 257 752) of infants with TSH concentrations lower than the 75th percentile scored less than the national minimum standard for numeracy, and this increased with each increase of percentile group to 11.3% (15 of 133) of infants with a TSH concentration between the 99.90th and 99.95th percentile. Infants with a neonatal TSH concentration in the 99.95th percentile or higher (above newborn screening cutoff) and likely to have diagnosed and treated congenital hypothyroidism had similar results to infants with a TSH concentration lower than the 75th percentile for both educational and developmental outcomes. Infants with a neonatal TSH concentration between the 99.5th and 99.9th percentile were more likely to have special needs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.68, 95% CI 1.23-2.30), poor numeracy performance (aOR 1.57, 1.29-1.90), and developmentally high risk (aOR 1.52, 1.20-1.93). Interpretation We found an association between neonatal TSH concentrations lower than the present newborn screening thresholds and poor educational and developmental outcomes. This association needs further investigation to assess whether assessment and treatment of these infants might improve their long-term cognitive outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available