4.7 Article

Accuracy Evaluation of the Landsat 9 Land Surface Temperature Product

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3212736

Keywords

Earth; Remote sensing; Artificial satellites; Land surface temperature; Uncertainty; Land surface; Sensitivity; Baseline surface radiation network (BSRN); Landsat 9; land surface temperature (LST); MOD11; MOD21; surface radiation budget network (SURFRAD)

Funding

  1. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [ZR2021QD055]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42001363, 42071308]
  3. Third Xinjiang Scientific Expedition Program [2021XJKK140304]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article evaluates the performance of the Landsat 9 land surface temperature (LST) product and compares it with the LST products from Landsat 7/8. The results show that the Landsat 9 LST product performs well and is similar to other products. The evaluation results also validate the consistency of the Landsat 9 LST product, indicating its usability in multiple applications.
Having a good knowledge of the uncertainty in the land surface temperature (LST) product will help to encourage its use in a wide number of applications, including urban heat islands, geothermal detection, and surface energy balance. Landsat 9 was launched on 27 September 2021 and provides an LST product, which is generated by the radiative transfer equation algorithm and has a spatial resolution of 30 m. In this article, we evaluated the performance of the Landsat 9 LST product by using a temperature-based (T-based) method and cross-validation. The T-based validation results showed that the average bias at the surface radiation budget network and baseline surface radiation network sites was 0.24 K and that the corresponding root mean square error (RMSE) was 3.42 K. The Landsat 9 LST product was in good agreement with the Landsat 7/8 LSTs, with an average bias of 0.25/0.08 K, an RMSE of 0.51/1.04 K, and a mean absolute error of 0.38/0.64 K. The comparable performance of the Landsat 7/8/9 LST products can be explained by the consistent LST retrieval algorithm. The absolute differences in the LST between Landsat 9 LST and MOD11 (MOD21) LST images were between 0.01 (0.65) and 2.50 K (1.76 K), whereas the RMSE values were between 1.40 (1.80) and 3.65 K (3.26 K). The specific heat capacity and thermal inertia of the different land surface covers can explain the significant biases. The above evaluation results are consistent with the initial performance testing of thermal infrared sensor-2 (TIRS-2) by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the U.S. Geological Survey. Although the released Landsat 9 LST product showed good performance in the preliminary evaluation, the split-window algorithm may be a better option for Landsat 9 LST retrieval, as the TIRS-2 data addressed stray light incursion. Since there are no official validation results that have been published, this article provides a third-party performance evaluation of the Landsat 9 LST product and will benefit research fields that require Landsat series LST products.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available