4.7 Article

Predicting pharmaceutical crystal morphology using artificial intelligence

Journal

CRYSTENGCOMM
Volume 24, Issue 43, Pages 7545-7553

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ce00992g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CMAC Future Manufacturing Research Hub
  2. Centre for Sustainable and Circular Technologies at the University of Bath

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The crystal morphology of active pharmaceutical ingredients is crucial for product design, manufacturing, and pharmacological performance. Artificial intelligence offers immense potential for developing data-driven predictive models of crystal morphology, leading to improved accuracy and efficiency in pharmaceutical product design.
The crystal morphology of active pharmaceutical ingredients is a key attribute for product design, manufacturing and pharmacological performance. Currently, the morphology of pharmaceutical crystals is designed and controlled through resource intensive screening methods, which rely on trial-and-error approaches and experience. The demand for a more efficient and sustainable approach has driven research into the development of 21st century predictive methods. In this work, we demonstrate how artificial intelligence offers extraordinary potential for developing predictive, data-driven morphology models. Here, machine learning algorithms were implemented to predict the morphology of crystalline products. Using publicly available data, key limitations were identified, highlighting the lack of systematic experimental detail. These issues were addressed through an in-house experimental screening campaign, which leveraged robotics to increase throughput and overcome the challenges associated with the inherently subjective morphology labelling. As a result, we show that data-driven models can predict crystal morphology with an accuracy of up to 87.9%. These results are proof of the predictive power of artificial intelligence for morphology prediction and pharmaceutical product design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available