4.6 Article

Opportunities for improved clinical trial designs in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Journal

LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages 916-924

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Abbott Diagnostics
  2. AM-Pharma
  3. US National Institutes of Health [NIH 5T32GM008440-24]
  4. NIH-National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) PETAL Network
  5. NIH [HL134828, HL126456, HL140026, 143896, HL103836, HL126176, HL158906]
  6. US Department of Defense

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common and high-mortality critical illness with no proven pharmacological treatments. The current definition does not capture the heterogeneity of clinical risk factors, imaging characteristics, physiology, timing of onset and trajectory, and biology of the syndrome. There is increasing interest in designing clinical trials that reduce heterogeneity in the trial population, while also working towards a global definition of ARDS. This article recommends strategies to improve future ARDS trials, including targeting treatable traits and increasing the representativeness of the trial population.
The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common critical illness syndrome with high morbidity and mortality. There are no proven pharmacological therapies for ARDS. The current definition of ARDS is based on shared clinical characteristics but does not capture the heterogeneity in clinical risk factors, imaging characteristics, physiology, timing of onset and trajectory, and biology of the syndrome. There is increasing interest within the ARDS clinical trialist community to design clinical trials that reduce heterogeneity in the trial population. This effort must be balanced with ongoing work to craft an indusive, global definition of ARDS, with important implications for trial design. Ultimately, the two aims-to design trials that are applicable to the diverse global ARDS population while also advancing opportunities to identify targetable traits-should coexist. In this Personal View, we recommend two primary strategies to improve future ARDS trials: the development of new methods to target treatable traits in clinical trial populations, and improvements in the representativeness of ARDS trials, with the inclusion of global populations. We emphasise that these two strategies are complementary. We also discuss how a proposed expansion of the definition of ARDS could affect the future of clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available