4.4 Article

Comparison of the Efficacy of Short-term Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Pulsed Radiofrequency for Treating Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus Neuralgia

Journal

CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume 38, Issue 11, Pages 686-692

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001074

Keywords

herpes zoster ophthalmicus; peripheral nerve stimulation; pulsed radiofrequency; pain

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2020YFC2008400, 2020YFC2008403]
  2. Key Science and Technology Project of Henan (International Science and Technology Cooperation Field) [182102410014]
  3. Medical Science and Technology Project of Henan [201602040]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the effect of therapy with peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) combined or PNS and PRF separately in patients with herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO). The results showed that both combined therapy and PNS alone can significantly decrease the pain score in HZO patients, with better long-term efficacy compared to PRF treatment alone.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of therapy with peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) combined or PNS and PRF separately in patients with herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO). Materials and Methods: This cohort study included 106 cases of HZO. Three groups were identified according to the type of treatment received: combination therapy (PNS+PRF) (n=38), PRF (n=37), and PNS (n=31). The observations at 0, 1, 2, and 4 weeks; 3 and 6 months; and 1 and 2 years after the operation were analyzed. Observations at each follow-up included baseline characteristics, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), concomitant pain medication usage, relapse rate, and adverse events. Results: The postoperative NRS of all 3 groups were significantly lower than preoperative scores. The PSQI of the 3 groups was significantly improved postoperatively, and the concomitant pain medication gradually decreased. Regarding long-term efficacy, the pain NRS and PSQI scores of the PNS+PRF and PNS groups were significantly lower than those of the PRF group (P<0.05), and the relapse rate of the PRF group was higher than that of the PNS+PRF and PNS groups (P<0.05). No significant difference was observed between the PNS+PRF and the PNS groups. Conclusion: Both PNS and PRF treatment of HZO can decrease the pain score, yielding no serious complications. The combination of PNS and PRF or PNS alone resulted in more significant pain relief than treatment with PRF alone. Thus, PNS therapy may be a better treatment option for HZO.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available