4.1 Article

The effect of wastewater pretreatment on nanofiltration membrane performance

Journal

JOURNAL OF WATER REUSE AND DESALINATION
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 45-52

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wrd.2016.083

Keywords

CFS; coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation; nanofiltration; PAC adsorption; pretreatment; wastewater

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Membrane fouling is considered a serious obstacle for operation and cost efficiency in wastewater treatment using nanofiltration (NF). However, pretreatment is the most practical way to reduce this prior to NF. In this research, two types of wastewaters were pretreated with different methods prior to NF to examine the effect of pretreatment on membrane fouling in terms of turbidity, chemical oxygen demand (COD) and permeate flux. Turbidity and COD were measured to assess solid foulants and organic species in thewastewater, respectively. The first samplewas secondary treated sewage, which was pretreated using coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation (CFS) only. Steady flux was increased from 24 L/m(2)h for wastewater without pretreatment to 32.1 L/m(2)h with pretreatment. COD was also eliminated after CFS/NF, and turbidity was reduced to 0.6 NTU. The second sample was diluted biodiesel wastewater, which was pretreated using a combination of powdered-activated carbon (PAC) adsorption and CFS (PAC/CFS). Steady flux was increased from 22.3 L/m(2)h for wastewater without pretreatment to 28.7 L/m(2)h with pretreatment; biodiesel wastewater quality also improved. Turbidity was reduced from 12 to 0.6 NTU, and COD was reduced from 526 to 4 mg/L after NF with PAC/CFS pretreatment, while COD was reduced from 526 to 95 mg/L using NF without pretreatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available