4.6 Article

Simultaneous quantification of nicotine salts in e-liquids by LC-MS/MS and GC-MS

Journal

ANALYTICAL METHODS
Volume 14, Issue 42, Pages 4185-4192

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ay00799a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Provincial and Ministerial Major Project of China [110202001007(XX-03), 110202001006(XX-02), 110202101018(XX-04), 110202001031(JY-14)]
  2. Innovation Project of China National Tobacco Quality Supervision and Test Center [552018AQ0090]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel approach using LC-MS/MS and GC-MS for the simultaneous quantification of non-volatile and volatile nicotine salts is presented. This method allows rapid and convenient detection of different nicotine salts and has been validated and applied in experiments.
Nicotine salts, formed by nicotine and organic acids, are commonly added to electronic cigarette liquids for their ability to provide desirable sensory effects. Analytical strategies have been developed to detect the types of organic acids and nicotine levels, but methods for directly measuring nicotine salts are still desirable. Herein, a novel approach is presented for the simultaneous quantification of non-volatile and volatile nicotine salts via liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectroscopy (LC-MS/MS) and gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy (GC-MS). This approach was validated with recovery experiments, which yielded recovery values between 92.0% and 110.8%. This method is the first technique for quantifying multiple nicotine salts that could be present in commercial e-liquids. Without using derivatization steps, different nicotine salts could be detected rapidly and conveniently. This new method was demonstrated with 10 e-cigarette liquid samples, providing satisfactory outcomes. It could be used to study organic acids and protonated nicotine in e-liquids and the release behaviour of nicotine salts in electronic cigarettes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available