3.8 Proceedings Paper

Boosted Ensemble Learning Based on Randomized NNs for Time Series Forecasting

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE - ICCS 2022, PT I
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 360-374

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-08751-6_26

Keywords

Boosted ensemble learning; Ensemble forecasting; Multiple seasonality; Randomized NNs; Short-term load forecasting

Funding

  1. Polish Minister of Science and Higher Education [020/RID/2018/19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, the authors propose an ensemble learning method based on randomized neural networks for forecasting complex time series. By unifying the tasks for all ensemble members, the authors simplify ensemble learning and achieve improved forecasting accuracy. Experimental results confirm the effectiveness of this method in forecasting time series with multiple seasonality.
Time series forecasting is a challenging problem particularly when a time series expresses multiple seasonality, nonlinear trend and varying variance. In this work, to forecast complex time series, we propose ensemble learning which is based on randomized neural networks, and boosted in three ways. These comprise ensemble learning based on residuals, corrected targets and opposed response. The latter two methods are employed to ensure similar forecasting tasks are solved by all ensemble members, which justifies the use of exactly the same base models at all stages of ensembling. Unification of the tasks for all members simplifies ensemble learning and leads to increased forecasting accuracy. This was confirmed in an experimental study involving forecasting time series with triple seasonality, in which we compare our three variants of ensemble boosting. The strong points of the proposed ensembles based on RandNNs are very rapid training and pattern-based time series representation, which extracts relevant information from time series.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available