4.6 Article

Effects of Maize Varieties on Biomass Yield and Silage Quality of Maize-Soybean Intercropping in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

Journal

FERMENTATION-BASEL
Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/fermentation8100542

Keywords

intercrop yield; mixed silage; fermentation quality; membership function

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32271766]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maize-soybean intercropping can improve forage production in plateau animal husbandry. Among the maize varieties tested, the intercropping of Demeiya No. 1 with soybeans showed the best results.
Forage deficiency is the bottleneck that restricts the development of plateau animal husbandry. Maize (Zea mays L.)-soybean (Glycine max L.) intercropping can improve the forage biomass yield and silage quality. This experiment was conducted in Ganzi Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture to explore the effects of four maize varieties (M1, Rongyu Silage No. 1; M2, Yayu 04889; M3, Demeiya No. 1; M4, Zhenghong 505) on biomass yield, nutritional composition, and silage quality in maize-soybean intercropping. The results showed that M1S had the highest total dry matter yield (18.03 t ha(-1)), M3S had the highest crude protein (CP) content (8.46% DM), and soybeans had the highest water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) content (8.55% DM). After silage, the CP content (13.44% DM) of mixed silage in M3S was higher, and the contents of neutral detergent fiber (39.42% DM) and acid detergent fiber (25.42% DM) were lower than those in maize silage alone. The WSC content (4.45% DM) of mixed silage in M3S was higher and the pH value (4.46) and ammonia-nitrogen to total nitrogen (3.97%) were lower than those of soybean silage alone. The results of membership function analysis showed that M3S was the best in fresh feeding and silage utilization, followed by M1S. Therefore, M3S (Demeiya No 1. intercropped with soybeans) is recommended in high-altitude areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available