3.8 Article

Proposal of an Algorithm for Choice of a Development System for Operational and Environmental Safety in Mining

Journal

RESOURCES-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/resources11100088

Keywords

algorithm; geotechnology; mathematical modeling; development system with backfill; mining and geological factors; strained mass; quantitative evaluation; disturbed rock; stress-strain state of rock mass

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a mathematical modeling method for solving the problem of reusing man-made waste from mining and ore processing. The study suggests using intermediate products such as tailings, rocks, and technical water as fill material in cyclic production. The influence of mining factors on fill material composition and parameters is justified, and a practical implementation with an algorithm is presented. Deformation changes and stress concentration are key criteria in the proposed model.
In this paper, a method of mathematical modeling for solving the problem of reusing man-made waste from mining and the processing of ores is proposed. The use of intermediate products (man-made waste: tailings of processing plants, rocks from sinking operations and the technical water of mine drainage) in cyclic production presupposes their use as fill material components and placement in the mined-out voids of underground mines. The influence of mining factors on the fill material composition and the parameters of the created fill mass is justified. The results of a practical implementation of the proposed mathematical model are presented, and an algorithm is compiled. Deformation changes and stress concentration are key criteria in the proposed mathematical model. The proposed algorithm allows for the determination of the preferred system of deposit development, and the selection of its parameters and the fill material composition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available