3.8 Proceedings Paper

POLYCRUISE: A Cross-Language Dynamic Information Flow Analysis

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31ST USENIX SECURITY SYMPOSIUM
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 2513-2530

Publisher

USENIX ASSOC

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ARO [W911NF-21-1-0027]
  2. NSF [CNS-1850434, CNS-2128703]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the limitations of existing program analysis techniques, POLYCRUISE enables holistic dynamic information flow analysis across multiple programming languages, thereby empowering security applications for multilingual software. The evaluation of POLYCRUISE demonstrates its practical scalability and promising capabilities in discovering cross-language security vulnerabilities.
Despite the fact that most real-world software systems today are written in multiple programming languages, existing program analysis based security techniques are still limited to single-language code. In consequence, security flaws (e.g., code vulnerabilities) at and across language boundaries are largely left out as blind spots. We present POLYCRUISE, a technique that enables holistic dynamic information flow analysis (DIFA) across heterogeneous languages hence security applications empowered by DIFA (e.g., vulnerability discovery) for multilingual software. POLYCRUISE combines a light language-specific analysis that computes symbolic dependencies in each language unit with a language-agnostic online data flow analysis guided by those dependencies, in a way that overcomes language heterogeneity. Extensive evaluation of its implementation for Python-C programs against micro, medium-sized, and large-scale benchmarks demonstrated POLYCRUISE's practical scalability and promising capabilities. It has enabled the discovery of 14 unknown cross-language security vulnerabilities in real-world multilingual systems such as NumPy, with 11 confirmed, 8 CVEs assigned, and 8 fixed so far. We also contributed the first benchmark suite for systematically assessing multilingual DIFA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available