4.5 Article

Predicting the Level of Respiratory Support in COVID-19 Patients Using Machine Learning

Journal

BIOENGINEERING-BASEL
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9100536

Keywords

COVID-19; respiratory support; machine learning; feature selection

Funding

  1. Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [PNURSP2022R40]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a machine learning-based system to predict the required level of respiratory support in COVID-19 patients. The system utilizes a two-stage classification approach to predict different levels of respiratory support. The research uses a dataset collected from tertiary care hospitals at the University of Louisville Medical Center and demonstrates the use of feature selection and dimensionality reduction methods.
In this paper, a machine learning-based system for the prediction of the required level of respiratory support in COVID-19 patients is proposed. The level of respiratory support is divided into three classes: class 0 which refers to minimal support, class 1 which refers to non-invasive support, and class 2 which refers to invasive support. A two-stage classification system is built. First, the classification between class 0 and others is performed. Then, the classification between class 1 and class 2 is performed. The system is built using a dataset collected retrospectively from 3491 patients admitted to tertiary care hospitals at the University of Louisville Medical Center. The use of the feature selection method based on analysis of variance is demonstrated in the paper. Furthermore, a dimensionality reduction method called principal component analysis is used. XGBoost classifier achieves the best classification accuracy (84%) in the first stage. It also achieved optimal performance in the second stage, with a classification accuracy of 83%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available