4.6 Article

Prediction on chemoselectivity for selected organocatalytic reactions by the DFT version of the Huckel-defined free valence index

Journal

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 21, Pages 6486-6494

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cy01118b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21773214]
  2. Natural Science Foundation for Excellent Young Scientist in Henan Province [212300410083]
  3. Training Plan for Young Key Teachers in Colleges and Universities in Henan Province [2020GGJS016]
  4. 111 Project [D20003]
  5. Program for Science & Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan [20HASTIT048]
  6. Program for Scientific and Technological Innovation Team in Universities of Henan [20IRTSTHN029]
  7. Cultivation Foundation of Zhengzhou University [JC202035022]
  8. National Supercomputing Center in Zhengzhou

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a method for predicting the active sites of substrates by calculating the HFV index and validates its reliability through case studies. The results indicate that higher HFV index corresponds to favorable chemoselective pathways.
Developing reliable indexes for the prediction of the actual chemical active site of substrates is one of the most challenging tasks in the chemistry field. Herein, we suggested a general method for predicting the possible active sites of intermediates or substrates by computing the DFT version of the Huckel-defined free valence index (HFV) and then validated the reliability of this method through several case studies. The calculated results indicate that the active site with a higher HFV index should correspond to the favorable chemoselective pathway in these cases. Therefore, this HFV computing method is of great significance for predicting the chemoselectivity for a wide range of organocatalytic reactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available