4.7 Article

Structurally Stable, High-Strength Graphene Oxide/Carbon Nanotube/Epoxy Resin Aerogels as Three-Dimensional Skeletal Precursors for Wave-Absorbing Materials

Journal

GELS
Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/gels8100618

Keywords

graphene oxide aerogel; carbon nanotubes; epoxy resin; mechanical property; microwave absorption

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51903129]
  2. China postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M612196]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [2014ZRB01840, 201807070028]
  4. Qingdao Postdoctoral Scientific Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A graphene oxide/carbon nanotube/epoxy resin composite aerogel (GCEA) with excellent mechanical properties, structural and thermal stability, high hydrophilicity, and microwave absorption has been successfully prepared by a facile method.
Three-dimensional (3D) graphene oxide aerogel (GOA) is one of the best fillers for composites for microwave absorption. However, its further development has been hindered by the poor mechanical properties. Methodology to improve the mechanical properties of the aerogel remains an urgent challenge. Herein, graphene oxide/carbon nanotube/epoxy resin composite aerogel (GCEA) was successfully prepared by a facile method. The results showed that the prepared GCEA with the hierarchical and 3D cross-linked structures exhibited excellent compression performance, structural and thermal stability, high hydrophilicity, and microwave absorption. The prepared GCEA recovered from multiple large strain cycles without significant permanent deformation. The minimum reflection loss (RL) was -39.60 dB and the maximum effective absorption bandwidth (EAB) was 2.48 GHz. The development of the enhanced GO aerogels will offer a new approach to the preparation of 3D microwave-absorbing skeletal materials with good mechanical properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available