Journal
JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 300-308Publisher
WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_58_22
Keywords
Degenerative spondylolisthesis; lumbar lordosis; patient-reported outcome measures; pelvic tilt; sacral slope; spinopelvic alignment
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Studies have shown that spinopelvic malalignment in adult spinal deformity results in worse outcomes, but it is unclear if this relationship exists in patients with single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis. This study aimed to determine the effect of spinopelvic alignment on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after posterior lumbar decompression and fusion in L4-5 DS patients.
Context: Studies on adult spinal deformity have shown spinopelvic malalignment results in worse outcomes. However, it is unclear if this relationship exists in patients with single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) receiving short-segment fusions. Aims: To determine if spinopelvic alignment affects patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after posterior lumbar decompression and fusion (PLDF) with or without a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with L4-5 DS. Settings and Design: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on patients who underwent PLDF for L4-5 DS at a single tertiary referral academic medical center. Materials and Methods: Patients were divided into groups based on preoperative cutoff values of 20 degrees for pelvic tilt (PT) and 11 degrees for pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) with subsequent reclassification based on correction to < 20 degrees PT or 11 degrees PI-LL. Radiographic outcomes and PROMs were compared between the groups. Statistical Analysis Used: Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to determine whether radiographic cutoff values served as the independent predictors of change in PROMs. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: A total of 188 patients with completed PROMs were included for the analysis. Preoperative PT > 20 degrees was associated with significantly greater reduction in PI-LL (-2.41 degrees vs. 1.21 degrees , P = 0.004) and increase in sacral slope (SS) (1.06 degrees vs. -1.86 degrees , P = 0.005) compared to patients with preoperative PT < 20 degrees. On univariate analysis, no significant differences were observed between any groups with regard to PROMs. Preoperative sagittal alignment measures and postoperative correction were not found to be independent predictors of improvement in clinical outcomes. Conclusion: A preoperative PT > 20 degrees is associated with improved PI-LL reduction and an increase in SS. However, no differences in clinical outcomes were found 1 year postoperatively for patients with preoperative PT > 20 degrees and PI-LL >= 11 degrees compared to patients below this threshold.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available