4.7 Article

Assessing the local structure and quantifying defects in Ca4Fe9O17 combining STEM and FAULTS

Journal

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
Volume 9, Issue 24, Pages 6425-6430

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2qi01951e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spain's Agencia Estatal de Investigacion Severo Ochoa Program for Centers of Excellence in RD [CEX2019-000917-S, PID2020-113805GB-I00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on the analysis of structural defects in Ca4Fe9O17, confirming their presence using various techniques and software, and discussing the impact of these defects on the properties of the material.
Defects in crystalline structures play a vital role in their properties, so their proper characterization is essential to understanding and improving the behaviour of the materials. In this work, their presence in Ca4Fe9O17 has been analysed. Its structure exhibits three different iron coordination topologies and can be described as layers of corner-sharing FeO5 bipyramids stacked along the c axis together with layers of edge-sharing FeO6 octahedra, both being linked by FeO4 tetrahedra. The relative position of the FeO4 tetrahedra generates three possible stacking directions, which results in stacking faults when more than one is combined. Structural refinement using the Rietveld method in X-ray and neutron powder diffraction data was not possible due to significant mismatches between the observed and calculated integrated intensities for several peaks resulting from this atomic disorder. Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) and high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (HR-STEM) images confirm the local defective nature of the material. The FAULTS software enabled a successful refinement of the structure considering a high concentration of planar defects, conferred by the existence of three possible stacking directions in the crystal structure, all of them confined in the basal plane.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available